About Me

Name: trespassers william
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Search

We?

Posted by trespassers william on Sunday, August 26, 2007 2:06:35 AM
I was listening to a conservative radio show this week as the host did an analysis of one of Hilary's speeches (I think it was to the VFW).  After the analysis the host allowed people to call and talk about the speech and the analysis.  One of the callers made a very interesting point; whenever she (Hilary) spoke of mistakes or failures they were the consequences of the Bush administration, but now that there appears to be signs of success with the military surge, well that was something "we" did.  Interesting how Hilary and others want to attach themselves to any of the successes that the Bush administration might have.  Just when did she and others like her (the Dems) go from being us vs. them, to we?  We (the real supporters of the U.S. and the U.S. military) have to carefully watch these people and not allow them or the MSM to try and weasel their way out of the truth.

Hilary and the Democrats have been banking on U.S. failure and our nation loosing in Iraq to further promote their agenda and their political party.  That is all they care about - just listen to House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D, S.C.) when he is interviewed and a hypothetical is posed about General Petraeus bringing a positive report back from Iraq if you don't believe that the Dems have bet their political future on U.S. defeat and humiliation.  We need to make sure that we do not let anyone forget that they are the party of and for the defeat and humiliation of the U.S.  We need to make sure that every citizen of the U. S. knows just where Hilary and the Democrats stand (and it is not for this country).  That way they can make a clear choice, are they for the U.S. or not?  Are they in to win, or do they choose to loose?  So again, I ask the question to Hilary and other Democrats, when did you become "we"? 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

About Illegal Aliens

Posted by trespassers william on Saturday, August 18, 2007 9:51:32 AM

These comments/questions are concerning the following Townhall piece;

http://townhall.com/news/us/2007/08/18/immigration_activist_leaves_sanctuary?page=full&comments=true#1781c460-4872-448b-960f-e501cf0bf82a

Several comments/questions;

"On Wednesday, Arellano announced she would travel to Washington, D.C., to lobby for immigration reform and participate in a prayer meeting Sept. 12.
Lozano said those plans haven't changed."

1. Will our government enforce our law and proceed to deport her (again) and other illegal aliens that they find at this "prayer meeting"?
Also, will they begin enforcing the law concerning businesses and organizations that knowingly harbor illegal aliens?

"Arellano came illegally to the United States to Washington state in 1997. She was deported to Mexico shortly after, but returned and moved to Illinois in 2000, taking a job cleaning planes at O'Hare International Airport.

She was arrested in 2002 at O'Hare and later convicted of working under a false Social Security number. She was to surrender to authorities last August, but asked instead to take refuge at her church to avoid deportation and separation from her son, who is a U.S. citizen."

2.  Evidently, she is not a law abiding citizen if she is;
a) back after being deported once before, and
b) refuses to follow the law again.


"Arellano is accompanied by people close to her, Lozano said, including the Rev. Walter Coleman, pastor of Adalberto United Methodist Church where she and her son have lived for more than a year.

Lozano, who is in Los Angeles, declined to say whether Arellano's 8-year-old son, Saul, is with her."

3. Do the math, her son is 8 she was originally deported in 1997, which means she did not have her son until after her second time ignoring U.S. law and sovereignty.  If she had been someone that abides by the law her son wouldn't be a "U.S citizen".
Also, the implications are that we shouldn't be so heartless and seperate a mother from her child.  Why can't she take her son with her back to where she came from?


"but returned and moved to Illinois in 2000, taking a job cleaning planes at O'Hare International Airport."

4. Illegals take jobs that U.S. citizens don't want and they make the cost of living cheaper for U.S. citizens.  Evidently, not.  I am sure there are quite of few legal citizens that wouldn't mind getting what the airline industries pay to clean airplanes.  Plus the cost of air travel hasn't gone down has it?

 

 

 


 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »