About Me

Name: trespassers william
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Search

Spines for the Spineless?

Posted by trespassers william on Saturday, January 31, 2009 7:24:28 AM
I keep hearing how the Republicans have finally found a backbone, but it is six years to late.  My only question is;
 
"If they truly have found some backbone...how long will they plan on keeping it?" 
 
In order for the U.S.A. to become a phoenix and be resurrected from the ashes of the last "election" and the coming four years is if we the people remember that any time the Great Oz looses, we the people win.  We the people must continually (24/7) keep the feet of those in the House and Senate to the fire.  We must also remember to thank them when they do the right thing.  So don't forget to thank these people;
 
Rep. Gene Taylor, MS-4
Rep. Heath Shuler, NC-11
Rep. Collin Peterson, MN-7
Rep. Walter Minnick, ID-1
Rep. Frank Kratovil, MD-1
Rep. Paul Kanjorski, PA-11
Rep. Parker Griffith, AL-5
Rep. Brad Ellsworth, IN-8
Rep. Jim Cooper, TN-5
Rep. Bobby Bright, AL-2
Rep. F. Boyd, FL-2
 
also, do not forget to thank all of thr Republicans for doing the right thing.
 
and if your not sure how to contact them;
 
 
Finally, make sure to also let them know that we the people want no part of any "stimulus" package and that we want no part of govenrment controlled medicare.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More "lipstick on a pig"

Posted by trespassers william on Thursday, January 29, 2009 8:12:43 AM
First of all, hats off to the 142 that voted against the "stimulus" package.  The reality is that they are right and the Great Oz (and his mentally diminutive Munchkins) are wrong.  Now, it would be extremely amusing to see that Oz is truly trying to put "lipstick on an extremely porkified pig" if the consequences to his actions were not so serious. After all, the mantra that Oz and his sycophants were chanting was "change".  There will now be a few that begin to see that what Oz and his munchkins meant by "change" was simply-bigger government and more socialism .  The numbers will not be great however, as the LSM will do their best "damage control" to their "American Idol" by taking their largest shovels to the problem of truth-I hope you are wearing your hip waders because it's going to get extremely deep.  This reminds me of the article by Dennis Praeger I read earlier this week;
 
He spoke with a 20 year old university student.  He quoted her as saying she believed the goverment was responsible for 9-11.  In the article he did not say whether he had asked her who she had voted for (she had asked him).   My belief is that, if she did vote then more then likely it was for the Great Oz, still it is only a hypothetical as I truly do not have that information.  What is not a hypothetical is that some (for the Leftist and the ACLU note I said "some" and not "all") of those who did vote for the Great Oz do believe that the government caused 9-11.  It is also no hypothetical that many who voted for Oz believe the government is evil.  So this begs the question, "Why did they vote for someone who intends on making government larger and more intrusive?"  Is it because they believe Oz will make government better?  Have they never read history?  When governments are made larger and given more power over people lives it never results in a better government or better living conditions for those the government is attempting to subjugate.  What it does produce is tyranny and a totalitarin state.    I am trying to understand their reasoning and logic, but honestly there seems to be none...as Oz himself stated (using that old addage-nothing original on his part of course), "...if you put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Britain says "NO" to the Great Oz

Posted by trespassers william on Wednesday, January 28, 2009 6:45:58 AM
I gather the Great Oz asked the British if they would take the terrorists from Guantanamo and the British wisely said, "NO!".  It is interesting that so many in the LSM and other places to the Left were screaming about how our great former President Bush had no plans after freeing Iraq from the brutal dictates of the murderous Hussein.  Yet nary a word is said about lack of plans where to put the newly released terrorists from Gitmo.  The British have shown that those terrorist are NIMYBY (that's Not In My Back Yard for those of you on the Left and in the LSM).  The Great Oz is attempting to put the NIMBY somewhere other then here...why? After all, if they are no threat to the safety and security of others then why not here In PA as Mirtha suggested?  The Great Oz wanted to close Gitmo to appease the Code Pink crowd and now Oz is faced with the problem of trying to make those terrorist look like they are not prisoners of a world-wide war that was declared by the Muslims.  My understanding is that Oz wanted to give them the same constitutional rights as a citizen of the U.S., i.e. a trial with a judge and jury of their peers (as opposed to a military tribunal-oh how Oz hates the military) .  The problem is their peers are to busy blowing themselves up or killing innocent Jews, women and children.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »